Social networks are killing the web
Remember CompuServe? If you do, you probably know that it was one of the early giants of the internet era, famous for its CD-ROMs and walled garden strategy. Like CompuServe's approach to keeping users locked into their ecosystem, today's social media platforms are attempting something similar, by punishing links.
"Killing" is a little hyperbolic perhaps, and the CompuServe reference will only mean something if you are of a certain age; but the point is valid.
Attention retention by all possible means
These platforms want you to stay on their domain, interacting with their content and consuming their ads. For them, a link to another website represents a threat. So they punish posts containing links, in some cases outright ban them!
The result? Many content creators (and even casual users), whose want to reach the largest possible audience, are forced to self-censor. Knowing that posts with links might have their reach reduced, they simply stop including them. This means fewer connections between information sources and less of the open, interconnected web that we have grown accustomed to.
Some try clever workarounds, like posting links in the comments instead of the main post. But even this tactic seems to be getting detected and punished by the algorithms. The message is clear: Links are not welcome.
Why care about links?
The World Wide Web (specifically HTTP) was built on the idea of links.
HTTP stands for Hypertext Transfer Protocol, Hypertext is a way to link and access information of various kinds as a web of nodes - it's foundational building block of what makes the web the web. If we no longer have links to other nodes, is it still a web? Imagine Wikipedia without citations?
The slow (or not so slow) death of the World Wide Web has started. (Sorry, more hyperbole - perhaps?)
By punishing posts that link out, they are breaking the very connections that make the internet great. Combine this with the deluge of hallucinated AI content (which is then harder to fact-check without links as supporting arguments/sources) and you have a very sorry evolution of the web.
%$£@ you, I won't do what you tell me
My tiny act of rebellion going forward will be to keep using links in my posts. I choose to sacrifice reach for value.
Might you do the same?